United States v. Armando Tagle
United States v. Armando Tagle
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6470
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. ARMANDO JIMENEZ TAGLE, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (3:12-cr-00295-MOC-DCK-1)
Submitted: August 18, 2015 Decided: September 1, 2015
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Armando Jimenez Tagle, Appellant Pro Se. Steven R. Kaufman, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Armando Jimenez Tagle appeals the district court’s order denying without prejudice his motion to dismiss his criminal indictment, conviction, and sentence for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Tagle, No. 3:12-cr-00295-MOC-DCK-1 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 6, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.