Harald Schmidt v. Steven Hunsberger
Harald Schmidt v. Steven Hunsberger
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1340
HARALD SCHMIDT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STEVEN HUNSBERGER; JOHN BURK, Defendants – Appellees, and MICHAEL BURKE, Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:14-cv-01372-LO-MSN; 1:14-cv-01373-LO-MSN)
Submitted: August 31, 2015 Decided: September 11, 2015
Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Harald Schmidt, Appellant Pro Se. Jeffrey Notz, COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Prince William, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Harald Schmidt appeals the district court’s orders consolidating his cases against Officers Steven Hunsberger and John Burk and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaints against the officers. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. See A/S J. Ludwig Mowinckles Rederi v. Tidewater Constr. Corp., 559 F.2d 928, 933 (4th Cir. 1977) (identifying district court’s broad discretion in consolidation issues); United States v. Buckner, 473 F.3d 551, 554-55 (4th Cir. 2007) (discussing apparent authority to consent to search). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.