U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2015

Courtnay Brissett v. Craven County

Courtnay Brissett v. Craven County
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 3, 2015

Courtnay Brissett v. Craven County

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2094

COURTNAY T. BRISSETT; LADWIN BRISSETT, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. CRAVEN COUNTY; CITY OF NEW BERN; FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY; SUMRELL, SUGG, CARMICHAEL, HICKS & HART, P.A.; WARD AND SMITH, P.A., Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. James C. Dever, III, Chief District Judge. (4:14-cv-00179-D)

Submitted: February 25, 2015 Decided: March 3, 2015

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Courtnay T. Brissett; Ladwin Brissett, Appellants Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Courtnay T. and Ladwin Brissett appeal the district court’s order dismissing their civil action under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brissett v. Craven Cnty., No. 4:14-cv- 00179-D (E.D.N.C. Sept. 26, 2014). We deny the Brissetts’ motion for injunctive relief pending appeal and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.