Clarence Hicks v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Clarence Hicks v. United States

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7309

CLARENCE HICKS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. (1:14-cv-02103-ELH)

Submitted: February 25, 2015 Decided: March 3, 2015

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clarence Hicks, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Clarence Hicks appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his motion filed under the All Writs Act,

28 U.S.C. § 1657

(2012). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in

forma pauperis and we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated

by the district court. Hicks v. United States, No. 1:14-cv-

02103-ELH (D. Md. July 11, 2014). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished