Clarence Hicks v. United States
Clarence Hicks v. United States
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7309
CLARENCE HICKS, Petitioner - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. (1:14-cv-02103-ELH)
Submitted: February 25, 2015 Decided: March 3, 2015
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clarence Hicks, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Clarence Hicks appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1657 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Hicks v. United States, No. 1:14-cv- 02103-ELH (D. Md. July 11, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.