Vincent Abell v. Maria Wilson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Vincent Abell v. Maria Wilson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1771

In re: VINCENT L. ABELL,

Debtor, -------------------------------------

VINCENT L. ABELL,

Debtor – Appellant,

v.

MARIA THERESA WILSON,

Appellee,

ROGER SCHLOSSBERG, Chapter 11,

Trustee - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District Judge. (8:14-cv-01037-DKC)

Submitted: February 20, 2015 Decided: March 2, 2015

Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Philip J. McNutt, HUGHES & BENTZEN, PLLC, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Richard M. Goldberg, Anastasia L. McCusker, SHAPIRO, SHER, GUINOT, & SANDLER, Baltimore, Maryland; Randell C. Ogg, LAW OFFICES OF RANDELL C. OGG, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Vincent L. Abell appeals from the district court’s order

upholding the bankruptcy court’s order imposing sanctions on

Abell for failure to comply with the court’s order compelling

his compliance with discovery in his bankruptcy case. On

appeal, Abell asserts due process challenges and argues that the

bankruptcy court abused its discretion by imposing the

sanctions. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of

discretion and no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. Abell v. Wilson, No.

8:14-cv-01037-DKC (D. Md. July 3, 2014). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished