United States v. Darryl Riley

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Darryl Riley

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7688

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DARRYL GLEN RILEY, a/k/a Kendu,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:98-cr-00101-HEH-1)

Submitted: February 25, 2015 Decided: March 2, 2015

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darryl Glen Riley, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Ronald Gill, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Darryl Glen Riley appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for modification of sentence under

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Riley, No. 3:98-cr-

00101-HEH-1 (E.D. Va. Oct. 15, 2014). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished