Sean Bundy v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Sean Bundy v. United States

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7588

SEAN R. BUNDY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:14-cv-01374-WDQ)

Submitted: February 25, 2015 Decided: March 2, 2015

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sean Rondell Bundy, Appellant Pro Se. Anthony Joseph Enright Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Sean R. Bundy appeals the district court’s order

denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. We have

reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion. See

Bereano v. United States,

706 F.3d 568, 575

(4th Cir. 2013)

(stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished