Kareem Currence v. E.K. Cauley

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Kareem Currence v. E.K. Cauley

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7622

KAREEM JAMAL CURRENCE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

E.K. CAULEY, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Senior District Judge. (1:11-cv-00088)

Submitted: February 25, 2015 Decided: March 2, 2015

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kareem Jamal Currence, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kareem Jamal Currence appeals the district court’s

orders denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P.

59(e) motions, and he has filed an application to proceed in

forma pauperis. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Currence leave

to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. See Currence v. Cauley, No. 1:11-cv-

00088 (S.D.W. Va. Oct. 8, 2014; Oct. 24, 2014). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished