Wade Stepney, Jr. v. R. Neville

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Wade Stepney, Jr. v. R. Neville

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7477

WADE STEPNEY, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DR. R. NEVILLE, SCDC KCI R&E; DR. LEWIS, SCDC PCI; NURSE BISHOP, SCDC PCI; DR. PAYAM YOUSEFIAM, Providence N.E. Family Care; WARDEN L. CARTLIDGE, SCDC PCI; ASSOCIATE WARDEN CLAYTOR, SCDC PCI; ASSOCIATE WARDEN MOONEY, SCDC PCI; DR. MONNIQUE SINGLETON, OCCRDC,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (1:13-cv-03073-JMC)

Submitted: February 24, 2015 Decided: February 27, 2015

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wade Stepney, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Steven Michael Pruitt, MCDONALD, PATRICK, POSTON, HEMPHILL & ROPER, LLC, Greenwood, South Carolina; Lydia L. Magee, Marian Williams Scalise, Bruce Hendricks Smith, RICHARDSON, PLOWDEN & ROBINSON, PA, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Wade Stepney, Jr., appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge to grant

the Defendants’ motions for summary judgment and denying relief

on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2012) complaint. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. See Stepney v.

Neville, No. 1:13-cv-03073-JMC (D.S.C. Sept. 24, 2014). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished