Wade Stepney, Jr. v. R. Neville
Wade Stepney, Jr. v. R. Neville
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7477
WADE STEPNEY, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DR. R. NEVILLE, SCDC KCI R&E; DR. LEWIS, SCDC PCI; NURSE BISHOP, SCDC PCI; DR. PAYAM YOUSEFIAM, Providence N.E. Family Care; WARDEN L. CARTLIDGE, SCDC PCI; ASSOCIATE WARDEN CLAYTOR, SCDC PCI; ASSOCIATE WARDEN MOONEY, SCDC PCI; DR. MONNIQUE SINGLETON, OCCRDC,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (1:13-cv-03073-JMC)
Submitted: February 24, 2015 Decided: February 27, 2015
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wade Stepney, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Steven Michael Pruitt, MCDONALD, PATRICK, POSTON, HEMPHILL & ROPER, LLC, Greenwood, South Carolina; Lydia L. Magee, Marian Williams Scalise, Bruce Hendricks Smith, RICHARDSON, PLOWDEN & ROBINSON, PA, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Wade Stepney, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge to grant
the Defendants’ motions for summary judgment and denying relief
on his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2012) complaint. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Stepney v.
Neville, No. 1:13-cv-03073-JMC (D.S.C. Sept. 24, 2014). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished