UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7500

DAVID E. HILL,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

HARVIE WILKINSON, Chief Judge; PAUL V. NIEMEYER, U.S. Circuit Judge; MICHAEL, U.S. Circuit Judge; WIDENER, U.S. Circuit Judge; DIANA G. MOTZ, U.S. Circuit Judge; ROBERT B. KING, U.S. Circuit Judge; DENNIS W. SHEDD, U.S. Circuit Judge; T. S. ELLIS, III, U.S. District Judge; CLAUDE M. HILTON, U.S. District Judge,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:13-cv-00127-RAJ-DEM)

Submitted: February 18, 2015 Decided: February 24, 2015

Before KEENAN, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David E. Hill, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

David E. Hill appeals the district court’s order dismissing

his Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of

Narcotics,

(1971), action without prejudice, and

the court’s subsequent order denying Hill’s Fed. R. Civ. P.

59(e) motion to alter or amend that judgment and to amend his

complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. See Hill v. Wilkinson, No. 2:13-cv-00127-RAJ-

DEM (E.D. Va. Feb. 3, 2014 & Sept. 22, 2014). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2