U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2015

Sharu Bey v. Warden Hollenbeck

Sharu Bey v. Warden Hollenbeck
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 5, 2015

Sharu Bey v. Warden Hollenbeck

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6468

SHARU BEY, Petitioner – Appellant, v. WARDEN HOLLENBECK, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:14-hc-02016-FL)

Submitted: September 24, 2015 Decided: October 5, 2015

Before MOTZ, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sharu Bey, Appellant Pro Se. Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Sharu Bey, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bey v. Hollenbeck, No. 5:14-hc-02016-FL (E.D.N.C. Feb. 27, 2015). We deny Bey’s motion for bail pending appeal and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.