U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2015

Donnise Batton v. Communication Workers

Donnise Batton v. Communication Workers
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 8, 2015

Donnise Batton v. Communication Workers

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1889

DONNISE BATTON, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. COMMUNICATION WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO; COMMUNICATION WORKERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL 2202; VERIZON VIRGINIA, INCORPORATED, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District Judge. (2:13-cv-00426-MSD-LRL)

Submitted: April 28, 2015 Decided: October 8, 2015

Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard F. Hawkins, III, HAWKINS LAW FIRM, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. SuAnne Hardee Bryant, DAVIS LAW GROUP, PC, Chesapeake, Virginia; Linda M. Martin, WILLIG, WILLIAMS & DAVIDSON, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Patricia A. Dunn, JONESDAY, Washington, D.C.; Brandon J. Lester, JONESDAY, Pittsburg, Pennsylvania, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Donnise Batton appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants in this action filed pursuant to Section 301 of the Laobr Management Relations Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Batton v. Commc’ns Workers of Am., No. 2:13-cv-00426-MSD-LRL (E.D. Va. Aug. 4, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.