Malcolm Muhammad v. L.J. Fleming
Malcolm Muhammad v. L.J. Fleming
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6732
MALCOLM MUHAMMAD, Plaintiff – Appellant, and MARVIN ELEY; DAVID FOLTZ, Plaintiffs, v. L. J. FLEMING, Warden; T. BARBETTO; S. FULLER; R. PERKINS, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:14-cv-00421-JLK-RSB)
Submitted: September 15, 2015 Decided: October 14, 2015
Before KING, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Malcolm Muhammad, Appellant Pro Se. Kate Elizabeth Dwyre, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Malcolm Muhammad appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Muhammad v. Fleming, No. 7:14-cv-00421-JLK-RSB (W.D. Va. Apr.
28, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.