U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2015

Eddie Gamble, Sr. v. Vernessa Craddock

Eddie Gamble, Sr. v. Vernessa Craddock
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 15, 2015

Eddie Gamble, Sr. v. Vernessa Craddock

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6875

EDDIE GAMBLE, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. VERNESSA CRADDOCK, Defendant – Appellee, and L. T. WRIGHT, Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:11-ct-03176-FL)

Submitted: September 29, 2015 Decided: October 15, 2015

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eddie Gamble, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lockridge, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Butner, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Eddie Gamble, Sr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on several postjudgment motions in his action filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Gamble’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Gamble has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we deny Gamble’s motion for appointment of counsel and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.