Marcus Ganzie v. Warden Ponton
Marcus Ganzie v. Warden Ponton
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6853
MARCUS GANZIE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN PONTON; INVESTIGATOR MOICJEK; COUNSELOR JACKSON; GRIEVANCE COORDINATOR N. MATHEWS; E.B.P. MANAGER M. DAVIS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief District Judge. (2:14-cv-00350-RBS-DEM)
Submitted: October 15, 2015 Decided: October 19, 2015
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marcus Ganzie, Appellant Pro Se. Margaret Hoehl O’Shea, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Marcus Ganzie appeals the district court’s judgment
granting the Defendants’ motion to dismiss and dismissing his
civil rights complaint for failing to state a claim. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Ganzie v. Warden Ponton, No. 2:14-cv-00350-RBS-DEM (E.D. Va.,
May 19, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished