Catherine Randolph v. Loretta Lynch

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Catherine Randolph v. Loretta Lynch

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1606

CATHERINE DENISE RANDOLPH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, United States Attorney General; ROD J. ROSENSTEIN, Maryland U.S. Attorney, Department of Justice, et al.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. George L. Russell, III, District Judge. (1:15-cv-01311-GLR)

Submitted: October 15, 2015 Decided: October 19, 2015

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Catherine Denise Randolph, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Catherine Denise Randolph seeks to appeal the district

court’s order granting her leave to proceed in forma pauperis,

denying her motion to amend her complaint, and ordering her to

show cause why she should not be enjoined from instituting new

filings. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final

orders,

28 U.S.C. § 1291

(2012), and certain interlocutory and

collateral orders,

28 U.S.C. § 1292

(2012); Fed. R. Civ. P.

54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,

337 U.S. 541

, 545-

46 (1949). The order Randolph seeks to appeal is neither a

final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished