United States v. Courtney Gilmore
United States v. Courtney Gilmore
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7279
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
COURTNEY MARKEE GILMORE, a/k/a Dust,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:09-cr-00501-JFA-6)
Submitted: October 15, 2015 Decided: October 20, 2015
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Courtney Markee Gilmore, Appellant Pro Se. Stacey Denise Haynes, Stanley D. Ragsdale, Assistant United States Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Courtney Markee Gilmore appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for a sentence reduction under Guidelines
Amendment 782. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Gilmore, No. 3:09-cr-
00501-JFA-6 (D.S.C. July 29, 2015). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished