United States v. Courtney Gilmore

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Courtney Gilmore

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7279

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

COURTNEY MARKEE GILMORE, a/k/a Dust,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:09-cr-00501-JFA-6)

Submitted: October 15, 2015 Decided: October 20, 2015

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Courtney Markee Gilmore, Appellant Pro Se. Stacey Denise Haynes, Stanley D. Ragsdale, Assistant United States Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Courtney Markee Gilmore appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for a sentence reduction under Guidelines

Amendment 782. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Gilmore, No. 3:09-cr-

00501-JFA-6 (D.S.C. July 29, 2015). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished