U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2015

Eddie Gamble, Sr. v. Dr. Onoha

Eddie Gamble, Sr. v. Dr. Onoha
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 20, 2015

Eddie Gamble, Sr. v. Dr. Onoha

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6876

EDDIE GAMBLE, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DR. ONOHA; UNKNOWN DEFENDANT, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:14-ct-03242-FL)

Submitted: October 15, 2015 Decided: October 20, 2015

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eddie Gamble, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Eddie Gamble, Sr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012) his action filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).

Because Gamble’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Gamble has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we deny Gamble’s motion for appointment of counsel and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.