United States v. Robert Ross

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Robert Ross

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6846

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

ROBERT KEITH ROSS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (1:07-cr-00117-MR-1; 1:09-cv-00365-MR)

Submitted: October 20, 2015 Decided: October 22, 2015

Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Keith Ross, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Jill Westmoreland Rose, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Robert Keith Ross appeals the district court’s order

construing his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion as a successive

28 U.S.C. § 2255

(2012) motion and dismissing it as such. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Ross, Nos. 1:07-cr-00117-MR-1; 1:09-cv-00365-MR

(W.D.N.C. May 11, 2015). We deny Ross’s motion for a

certificate of appealability. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished