In re: Lemoyne Veney v.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

In re: Lemoyne Veney v.

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1900

In re: LEMOYNE VENEY, a/k/a Victor Demaris

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (Nos. 1:11-cr-00691-RDB-1; 1:14-cv-02324-RDB)

Submitted: October 20, 2015 Decided: October 22, 2015

Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lemoyne Veney, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Lemoyne Veney petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging

that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his

28 U.S.C. § 2255

(2012) motion He seeks an order from this court

directing the district court to act. We find the present record

does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly,

we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the

mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished