U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2015

United States v. Michael Doughty Williams

United States v. Michael Doughty Williams
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 23, 2015 · Keenan, Motz, Per Curiam, Thacker
621 F. App'x 225

United States v. Michael Doughty Williams

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Doughty Williams appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction based on Amendment 782 to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the .reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Williams, No. 5:09-cr-00162-BR-1 (E.D.N.C. July 21, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.