United States v. Clyde Whitley
United States v. Clyde Whitley
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7177
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CLYDE KIRBY WHITLEY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:07-cr-00080-FL-1)
Submitted: October 20, 2015 Decided: October 23, 2015
Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clyde Kirby Whitley, Appellant Pro Se. Jane J. Jackson, Assistant United States Attorney, Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Clyde Kirby Whitley appeals the district court’s order
denying his
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence
reduction and related motions. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Whitley’s
motions to amend and for mandamus relief and affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Whitley,
No. 5:07-cr-00080-FL-1 (E.D.N.C. July 8, 2015). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished