Joseph Ruhren v. Marcos Spittal

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Joseph Ruhren v. Marcos Spittal

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6905

JOSEPH RUHREN,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

MARCOS SPITTAL, Detective Prince William County Police; LUTHER, Sergeant Manassas A.D.C.; MELETIS, Superintendent Manassas A.D.C.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, District Judge. (1:15-cv-00445-AJT-JFA)

Submitted: October 20, 2015 Decided: October 23, 2015

Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Ruhren, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Joseph Ruhren appeals the district court’s order dismissing

his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)

(2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Ruhren v. Spittal, No. 1:15-cv-00445-AJT-JFA

(E.D. Va. May 14, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished