Joseph Ruhren v. Marcos Spittal
Joseph Ruhren v. Marcos Spittal
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6905
JOSEPH RUHREN,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
MARCOS SPITTAL, Detective Prince William County Police; LUTHER, Sergeant Manassas A.D.C.; MELETIS, Superintendent Manassas A.D.C.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, District Judge. (1:15-cv-00445-AJT-JFA)
Submitted: October 20, 2015 Decided: October 23, 2015
Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph Ruhren, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Joseph Ruhren appeals the district court’s order dismissing
his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)
(2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Ruhren v. Spittal, No. 1:15-cv-00445-AJT-JFA
(E.D. Va. May 14, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished