U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2015

Joseph Ruhren v. Marcos Spittal

Joseph Ruhren v. Marcos Spittal
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 23, 2015

Joseph Ruhren v. Marcos Spittal

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6905

JOSEPH RUHREN, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. MARCOS SPITTAL, Detective Prince William County Police; LUTHER, Sergeant Manassas A.D.C.; MELETIS, Superintendent Manassas A.D.C., Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, District Judge. (1:15-cv-00445-AJT-JFA)

Submitted: October 20, 2015 Decided: October 23, 2015

Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Ruhren, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Joseph Ruhren appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ruhren v. Spittal, No. 1:15-cv-00445-AJT-JFA (E.D. Va. May 14, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.