Connell Hawkins v. Officer Kinlaw

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Connell Hawkins v. Officer Kinlaw

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6976

CONNELL D. HAWKINS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

OFFICER KINLAW; OFFICER STRICKLAND; OFFICER RUSSELL; OFFICER BULLARD; OFFICER J. PRINCE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:14-ct-03241-F)

Submitted: October 20, 2015 Decided: October 23, 2015

Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Connell D. Hawkins, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Connell D. Hawkins appeals the district court’s order

dismissing without prejudice his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2012)

complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny Hawkins’ motion for appointment of

counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Hawkins v. Kinlaw, No. 5:14-ct-03241-F (E.D.N.C. June 12, 2015)

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished