Connell Hawkins v. Officer Kinlaw
Connell Hawkins v. Officer Kinlaw
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6976
CONNELL D. HAWKINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. OFFICER KINLAW; OFFICER STRICKLAND; OFFICER RUSSELL; OFFICER BULLARD; OFFICER J. PRINCE, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:14-ct-03241-F)
Submitted: October 20, 2015 Decided: October 23, 2015
Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Connell D. Hawkins, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Connell D. Hawkins appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Hawkins’ motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Hawkins v. Kinlaw, No. 5:14-ct-03241-F (E.D.N.C. June 12, 2015) We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.