United States v. Ernest Tucker
United States v. Ernest Tucker
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6579
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
ERNEST MELVIN TUCKER, a/k/a Sonny Tucker,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:95-cr-00011-GMG-1)
Submitted: October 30, 2015 Decided: November 4, 2015
Before KING, SHEDD, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ernest Melvin Tucker, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Ernest Melvin Tucker appeals the district court’s order
denying his
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence
reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Tucker, No. 3:95-cr-00011-GMG-
1 (N.D. W. Va. Apr. 7, 2015). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished