United States v. Ernest Tucker

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Ernest Tucker

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6579

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

ERNEST MELVIN TUCKER, a/k/a Sonny Tucker,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:95-cr-00011-GMG-1)

Submitted: October 30, 2015 Decided: November 4, 2015

Before KING, SHEDD, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ernest Melvin Tucker, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Ernest Melvin Tucker appeals the district court’s order

denying his

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence

reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. Tucker, No. 3:95-cr-00011-GMG-

1 (N.D. W. Va. Apr. 7, 2015). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished