Piper Rountree v. Tammy Brown

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Piper Rountree v. Tammy Brown

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6655

PIPER A. ROUNTREE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

TAMMY BROWN,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

HAROLD CLARK; JOHN JABE; WENDY HOBBS; D. RADCLIFF-WALKER; T. COX; K. STAPLETON; D. CARTER; P. SOUKOP; MS. SWANN; S. HORN; V. BOOKER; GENE JOHNSON; MS. SNOW; J. BLAND,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Chief District Judge. (7:11-cv-00572-GEC-RSB)

Submitted: October 30, 2015 Decided: November 5, 2015

Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Piper A. Rountree, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Kate Elizabeth Dwyre, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Piper A. Rountree appeals the district court’s orders

denying relief on her

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2012) complaint and her

Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Rountree v. Brown, No.

7:11-cv-00572-GEC-RSB (W.D. Va. Mar. 9, 2015; Mar. 26, 2015).

We deny Rountree’s motion for transcripts at the government’s

expense and dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished