U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2015

Piper Rountree v. Tammy Brown

Piper Rountree v. Tammy Brown
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 5, 2015

Piper Rountree v. Tammy Brown

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6655

PIPER A. ROUNTREE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. TAMMY BROWN, Defendant - Appellee, and HAROLD CLARK; JOHN JABE; WENDY HOBBS; D. RADCLIFF-WALKER; T.

COX; K. STAPLETON; D. CARTER; P. SOUKOP; MS. SWANN; S. HORN; V. BOOKER; GENE JOHNSON; MS. SNOW; J. BLAND, Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Chief District Judge. (7:11-cv-00572-GEC-RSB)

Submitted: October 30, 2015 Decided: November 5, 2015

Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Piper A. Rountree, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Kate Elizabeth Dwyre, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Piper A. Rountree appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint and her Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rountree v. Brown, No. 7:11-cv-00572-GEC-RSB (W.D. Va. Mar. 9, 2015; Mar. 26, 2015).

We deny Rountree’s motion for transcripts at the government’s expense and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.