Joey Scott v. Reuben Young

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Joey Scott v. Reuben Young

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6908

JOEY DUANE SCOTT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

REUBEN FRANKLIN YOUNG; ROBERT C. LEWIS; FRANK L. PERRY; HATTIE PIMPONG; JAMES M. JOHNSON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:12-ct-03159-FL)

Submitted: October 30, 2015 Decided: November 12, 2015

Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joey Duane Scott, Appellant Pro Se. Yvonne Bulluck Ricci, Assistant Attorney General, Kimberly D. Grande, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Joey Duane Scott appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2012) complaint and certain

nondispositive orders. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Scott v. Young, No. 5:12-ct-03159-FL

(E.D.N.C. June 19, 2014; Oct. 7, 2014, Jan. 22, 2015; Apr. 15,

2015; May 28, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished