U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2015

Joey Scott v. Reuben Young

Joey Scott v. Reuben Young
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 12, 2015

Joey Scott v. Reuben Young

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6908

JOEY DUANE SCOTT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. REUBEN FRANKLIN YOUNG; ROBERT C. LEWIS; FRANK L. PERRY; HATTIE PIMPONG; JAMES M. JOHNSON, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:12-ct-03159-FL)

Submitted: October 30, 2015 Decided: November 12, 2015

Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joey Duane Scott, Appellant Pro Se. Yvonne Bulluck Ricci, Assistant Attorney General, Kimberly D. Grande, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Joey Duane Scott appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint and certain nondispositive orders. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Scott v. Young, No. 5:12-ct-03159-FL (E.D.N.C. June 19, 2014; Oct. 7, 2014, Jan. 22, 2015; Apr. 15, 2015; May 28, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.