Raleigh Anderson v. United States
Raleigh Anderson v. United States
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1825
RALEIGH ANDERSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant – Appellee, and SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION; GEORGE MCCONNELL, Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (4:15-cv-00003-JLK-RSB)
Submitted: November 17, 2015 Decided: November 19, 2015
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Raleigh Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Kartic Padmanabhan, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Raleigh Anderson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Anderson’s informal brief does not challenge the bases for the district court’s disposition, Anderson has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we grant Anderson’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.