United States v. Reginald McKinnon

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Reginald McKinnon

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7321

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

REGINALD MCKINNON, a/k/a Reg, a/k/a Big Reggie,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (4:14-cr-00259-RBH-8)

Submitted: November 17, 2015 Decided: November 20, 2015

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reginald McKinnon, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Reginald McKinnon appeals the district court’s order

denying his

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c) (2012) motion. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

McKinnon, No. 4:14-cr-00259-RBH-8 (D.S.C. Aug. 6, 2015). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished