United States v. Reginald McKinnon
United States v. Reginald McKinnon
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7321
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
REGINALD MCKINNON, a/k/a Reg, a/k/a Big Reggie,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (4:14-cr-00259-RBH-8)
Submitted: November 17, 2015 Decided: November 20, 2015
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Reginald McKinnon, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Reginald McKinnon appeals the district court’s order
denying his
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2012) motion. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
McKinnon, No. 4:14-cr-00259-RBH-8 (D.S.C. Aug. 6, 2015). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished