U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2015

Paul Lovings v. Randall Mathena

Paul Lovings v. Randall Mathena
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 20, 2015

Paul Lovings v. Randall Mathena

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7057

PAUL A. LOVINGS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RANDALL C. MATHENA, Warden of Red Onion State Prison; OFFICER D.C. DUPIE; OFFICER J.L. DOOLEY; SERGEANT BARTON; SERGEANT L. COLLINS; SERGEANT TOHIA PHILLIPS; SERGEANT B.P. MEADE; LIEUTENANT DAY; LIEUTENANT T.G. LYALL; UNIT MANAGER W.G. SWINEY; NURSE MS. CLARK; OFFICER R.J. SLUSS; LIEUTENANT JAMES D. LAMBERT; COUNSELOR S. M. MULLINS, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:14-cv-00359-JLK-RSB)

Submitted: November 17, 2015 Decided: November 20, 2015

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paul A. Lovings, Appellant Pro Se. Margaret Hoehl O’Shea, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. _______________ Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Paul A. Lovings appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lovings v. Mathena, No. 7:14-cv-00359-JLK-RSB (W.D. Va. June 19, 2015).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.