Malcom Ryidu-X v. Maryland Division of Correction
Malcom Ryidu-X v. Maryland Division of Correction
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7110
MALCOM MAXWELL RYIDU-X, a/k/a Richard Janey,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MARYLAND DIVISION OF CORRECTION; WESTERN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; JOHN DOE, Inmate Commissary Supervisor; MARYLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION- HAGERSTOWN; LEE ANN CRAWFORD, Office Secretary II; MAUREEN REID, Case Management Supervisor; JOHN DOE, Keefe employee who processes inmate requests; TONY UNKNOWN, Inmate Commissary Supervisor for MCI-H; KEEFE COMMISSARY NETWORK, LLC.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:14-cv-01735-WDQ)
Submitted: November 17, 2015 Decided: November 20, 2015
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Malcom Maxwell Ryidu-X, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Malcom Maxwell Ryidu-X seeks to appeal the district court’s
order dismissing some, but not all, of his claims brought
pursuant to
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2012). This court may exercise
jurisdiction only over final orders,
28 U.S.C. § 1291(2012),
and certain interlocutory and collateral orders,
28 U.S.C. § 1292(2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.
Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541, 545-46(1949). The order Ryidu-X
seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable
interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny Ryidu-
X’s motion for preliminary injunction and dismiss the appeal for
lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished