Kirk Loney v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Kirk Loney v. United States

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6601

KIRK LEE LONEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; COFFEY, I.S.M.; MOORE, C.C.M.; CROOMES, Mail Clerk; HARRELL WATTS; WADE MOORE; JOHN DOE; JANE DOE; STEWART, Mail Clerk; A. W. ENGEL; TABOR, Unit Manager; CUFFEE, Counselor; K. BLANKENSHIFT, Correctional Officer; LIEUTENANT BROE; MCDONALD, Dentist; ROACHE, Dentist; MCDOUGAL, Dental Assistant; PATRICIA STANSBERRY, Warden; BROWN, Case Manager,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

UNKNOWN STAFF FOR F.C.C. PETERSBURG MEDIUM; UNKNOWN OFFICIALS FOR PETERSBURG, VIRGINIA U.S.P.S., sued in their individual capacities,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:11-cv-00845-REP)

Submitted: November 19, 2015 Decided: November 23, 2015

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kirk L. Loney, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Wu, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Kirk L. Loney appeals the district court’s order dismissing

his complaint filed pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28

U.S.C. §§ 2671–2680 (2012). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave

to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Loney v. United States, No. 3:11–cv–

00845–REP (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 18, 2015; entered Feb. 19, 2015).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished