U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2015

James Davenport v. Sallie Mae, Inc.

James Davenport v. Sallie Mae, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 24, 2015

James Davenport v. Sallie Mae, Inc.

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1677

JAMES E. DAVENPORT, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. SALLIE MAE, INC.; SLM CORPORATION, Defendants – Appellees, and EQUIFAX, INC.; EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC; EXPERIAN DATA CORP.; EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.; TRANS UNION, LLC, Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:12-cv-01475-PJM)

Submitted: October 29, 2015 Decided: November 24, 2015

Before NIEMEYER and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James E. Davenport, Appellant Pro Se. John S. Bolesta, Denise E.

Giraudo, OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: James E. Davenport appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of defendants in this civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Davenport v. Sallie Mae, Inc., No. 8:12-cv-01475-PJM (D. Md. June 5, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.