United States v. Clarence Jupiter
United States v. Clarence Jupiter
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6987
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CLARENCE SHELDON JUPITER, a/k/a Star,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Michael F. Urbanski, District Judge. (5:93-cr-00004-MFU-1)
Submitted: September 29, 2015 Decided: November 25, 2015
Before WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clarence Sheldon Jupiter, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Clarence Sheldon Jupiter appeals the district court’s order
granting his motion pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012)
for a sentence reduction. * We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v.
Jupiter, No. 5:93-cr-00004-MFU-1 (W.D. Va. filed June 8, 2015 &
entered June 9, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* The district court granted Jupiter’s § 3582(c)(2) motion, but did not reduce Jupiter’s sentence to the full extent he requested.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished