Michael Ruth v. City of Creedmoor

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Michael Ruth v. City of Creedmoor

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1745

MICHAEL RUTH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CITY OF CREEDMOOR; ROBERT G. MORRIS, in his official and individual capacities; JOHN DOES 1-10, in their official and individual capacities,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (5:13-cv-00862-BR)

Submitted: November 10, 2015 Decided: November 30, 2015

Before KING and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Ruth, Appellant Pro Se. Dan M. Hartzog, Jr., CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Michael Ruth appeals the district court’s order granting

summary judgment to the Defendants in his civil action. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See

Ruth v. City of Creedmoor, No. 5:13-cv-00862-BR (E.D.N.C. June

30, 2015). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished