Christopher Chin-Young v. Gary Rowell
Christopher Chin-Young v. Gary Rowell
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1500
CHRISTOPHER CHIN-YOUNG, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GARY L. ROWELL, Department of the Army; LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General; U.S. ATTORNEY, of the United States; WILLIAM D. SPENCER; KATHLEEN D. COLE; DENISE S. PRICE; NICOLE DECRESCENZO, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, Senior District Judge. (8:13-cv-03772-RWT)
Submitted: October 30, 2015 Decided: November 30, 2015
Before DUNCAN and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher Chin-Young, Appellant Pro Se. Tarra DeShields Minnis, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Christopher Chin-Young appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil action and denying his motions for reconsideration. * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. Chin-Young v. Powell, No. 8:13-cv-03772-RWT (D. Md. Apr. 2, 2015; May 7, 2015; May 19, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* We construe Chin-Young’s informal brief as a timely notice of appeal from the orders denying his motions for reconsideration. See Smith v. Barry, 502 U.S. 244, 248-49 (1992); Hughes v. Halifax Cnty. Sch. Bd., 823 F.2d 832, 834-35 (4th Cir. 1987).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.