U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2015

Benjamin Doyle, Sr. v. Judge Hending

Benjamin Doyle, Sr. v. Judge Hending
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 14, 2015

Benjamin Doyle, Sr. v. Judge Hending

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6923

BENJAMIN L. DOYLE, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JUDGE HENDING; HALIFAX COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE; HALIFAX COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT; STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:15-ct-03081-FL)

Submitted: December 3, 2015 Decided: December 14, 2015

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Benjamin L. Doyle, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Benjamin L. Doyle, Sr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Doyle v. Hending, No. 5:15-ct-03081-FL (E.D.N.C. May 10, 2015).

We deny Doyle’s motion to be heard and his motions for a complete and full discovery of all evidence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.