Hieda Keeler v. Lawrence Chang

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Hieda Keeler v. Lawrence Chang

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2070

HIEDA KEELER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DR. LAWRENCE CHANG; PARISER DERMATOLOGY; DR. DENNIS CRUFF; HAMPTON SENTARA SURGERY SPECIALISTS; HAMPTON SENTARA CAREPLEX; DR. BERNIE SKINNER; TIDEWATER DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (4:15-cv-00019-AWA-TEM)

Submitted: December 15, 2015 Decided: December 17, 2015

Before GREGORY and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Hieda A. Keeler, Appellant Pro Se. Rodney Seth Dillman, HANCOCK, DANIEL, JOHNSON & NAGLE, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia; Dorinda Parkola Burton, Michael Todd Gerber, POOLE MAHONEY, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia; Isaac Abraham McBeth, RAWLS, MCNELIS & MITCHELL, PC, Richmond, Virginia; Joseph Tedford McFadden, Jr., RAWLS, MCNELIS & MITCHELL, PC, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Hieda A. Keeler appeals the district court’s order

dismissing her

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2012) complaint. On appeal, we

confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s

brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Keeler’s informal brief

does not challenge the basis for the district court’s

disposition, Keeler has forfeited appellate review of the

court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s

judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished