United States v. Randle Cooke

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Randle Cooke

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7199

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Petitioner - Appellee,

v.

RANDLE PORTER COOKE,

Respondent - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:09-hc-02034-FL)

Submitted: December 15, 2015 Decided: December 18, 2015

Before GREGORY and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James B. Craven, III, Durham, North Carolina, for Appellant. Michael Bredenberg, Special Assistant United States Attorney, G. Norman Acker, III, Matthew Fesak, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Randle Porter Cooke appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for a review hearing. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Cooke, No. 5:09-hc-02034-FL (E.D.N.C. July 8, 2015). We deny

Cooke’s motion for the appointment of counsel. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished