United States v. Samuel Barrington

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Samuel Barrington

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7307

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

SAMUEL LEE BARRINGTON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, District Judge. (1:12-cr-00197-CCE-1; 1:13-cv-00510-CCE-JLW)

Submitted: December 18, 2015 Decided: December 22, 2015

Before AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Samuel Lee Barrington, Appellant Pro Se. Harry L. Hobgood, Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Stephen Thomas Inman, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Samuel Lee Barrington appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his

28 U.S.C. § 2255

(2012) motion. The district

court granted a certificate of appealability on one issue:

whether Barrington was entitled to resentencing following the

Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Johnson,

135 S. Ct. 2551

(2015). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. Barrington, Nos. 1:12-cr-

00197-CCE-1; 1:13-cv-00510-CCE-JLW (M.D.N.C. July 31, 2015). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished