United States v. Ryan Dixon

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Ryan Dixon

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7444

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

RYAN LAMAR DIXON, a/k/a Big Gee,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (3:11-cr-00686-CMC-1)

Submitted: December 17, 2015 Decided: December 22, 2015

Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ryan Lamar Dixon, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Barrett Taylor, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Ryan Lamar Dixon appeals the district court’s order denying

Dixon’s motion to reconsider the court’s prior order denying his

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Dixon, No. 3:11-cr-00686-CMC-1 (D.S.C.

Aug. 27, 2015); see also United States v. Goodwyn,

596 F.3d 233, 235-36

(4th Cir. 2010) (district court is without authority to

reconsider ruling on a § 3582(c)(2) motion). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished