Antonio Cain v. Martinez
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Antonio Cain appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Cain’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cain v. Martinez, No. 1:15-cv-00968-TSE-IDD (E.D.Va. Aug. 3, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Antonio CAIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Cpl. MARTINEZ, Correctional facility/co; Officer Rideout, Riverside Regional Jail/correctional Officer; Sgt. Whorley, Riverside Regional Jail/correctional Officer; Riverside Regional Jail, Correctional Facility; Sgt. Ronney, Riverside Regional Jail/correctional Jail, Defendants-Appellees
- Status
- Unpublished