Martin v. Byars
Opinion of the Court
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Henry W. Martin, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Martin’s claims against all but one Defendant without prejudice. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Martin seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Henry W. MARTIN, Jr. v. William R. BYARS John R. Pate Arthur A. Jordan McKenndly Newton Robert E. Ward Jon Ozmint Dennis Patterson Daniel Murphy David M. Tatarsky Lt. J. Carujo Lt. J. Carter Robert Orr Lt. James Rump Captain E.J. Miller Dr. Thomas Bynse Lt. Varlease Black Cpl L. Jenkins Cpt Myecha Miley M. Hudson S. Singlaton, Dho Cpl. T. Simpson Mr. McQueen P. Smith A. Hollman Helen Freeman Thomas Scott Cpt. E. James Tanya A. Gee V. Claire Allen John C. Few Wayne C. McCabe Jill Beattie Jeannette Mack Francine Bauchman Patty Britt Posey James S. Sligh, Jr. Dr. Rowland Gregory S. Line Charlotte Smith Ellen Goodwin Russell Rush Jim Crosby Susan Barden Virginia Crocker Pam Smith Laketa Dika Deborah B. Durden
- Status
- Published