Godwin v. Clarke
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Keith Earl Godwin appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Godwin v. Clarke, No. 2:13-cv-00691-RAJ-TEM (E.D.Va. Sept. 25, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Keith Earl GODWIN v. Harold CLARKE, Director Robert F. Haley, II, Commonwealth Attorney Chesapeake Circuit Court Judge
- Status
- Published