McFadden v. Westley
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Bernard McFadden appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 'by the district court. McFadden v. Westley, No. 0:12-cv-02392-JMC, 2014 WL 4104714 (D.S.C. Aug. 19, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Bernard McFADDEN v. Mr. WESTLEY, Officer of Kirkland's Law Library Christopher Florian, SCDC Staff Attorney Diane Hingle, SCDC State Classification Officer Candi L. Cannon, SCDC State Classification Officer Mrs. York, Kershaw Institutional Classification Officer Mr. Eury, FNU Kershaw Institutional Classification Officer Mrs. Amason, and Margaret Sullivan, 3d Circuit Court Reporter Mary Williams, SC Assistant Attorney General Charles T. Brooks, Court Appointed PCR Attorney Ms. Hough, Grievance Coordinator of Kershaw CI Ms. Reynolds, Warden of Kershaw, in their individual or personal capacities
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published