Maxwell v. Robinson
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Bradley Maxwell appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Maxwell v. Robinson, No. 7:13-cv-00556-JLK-RSB, 2014 WL 5499087 (W.D.Va. Oct. 30, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Bradley MAXWELL v. David ROBINSON George Hinkle Gregory Holloway U.M. Swiney Dennis Collins Lt. King John Combs Todd Farris Iho Burton C/O Wright C/O Bellamy Adina Pogue Counselor Treadway
- Status
- Published