Chew v. Green

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit January 27, 2015

Chew v. Green, 591 F. App'x 203 (4th Cir. 2015)

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Chew appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Chew’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Chew v. Gatewood, No. 8:13-cv-02115-DKC (D.Md. Sept. 2, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name: Michael CHEW v. Kathleen GREEN, Warden James Tichnell, and Paul Wisengoff Gregory Birch Bruce Bozman Denise Gelsinger Scott Rowe, Correctional Case Management Specialist Hamilton, Gang Intel v. Office of the Attorney General, Party-in-Interest
Status: Published